The Montreal Protocol
The Montreal Protocol (1987) is a landmark in
environmental policy-making because it was the first
international treaty designed on the basis of scientific
evidence, with the aim of preventing a global problem from
becoming worse. The Protocol controls both the production
and consumption of the various ozone depleting substances.
Shortly after the Protocol was adopted, scientists
established conclusively that CFCs and other
ozone-depleting substances had contributed to the ozone
hole. In 1990, at the 2nd Meeting of the Parties to the
Montreal Protocol in London, the 80 countries present
agreed that the production and consumption of CFCs and
halons should be phased out by the year 2000 in developed
countries. Developing countries negotiated an additional 10
years to comply with these controls and are required to
phase out CFCs and halons by 2010. The London Amendment
also established a Multilateral Fund to provide financial
assistance to developing countries to meet the cost of the
phase-out.
The 1992 Meeting of the Parties in Copenhagen brought
forward the phase-out dates of chemicals already controlled
by the Protocol and introduced controls for HCFCs. The
Parties also agreed a freeze on the production and
consumption of methyl bromide at 1991 levels from 1995,
with an exemption for the amounts used for quarantine and
pre-shipment fumigations. A definition of essential uses
was agreed and resolutions were adopted to encourage
recovery, recycling, leakage control and the destruction of
ozone depleting substances.
At the 1995 Meeting of the Parties in Vienna, a
phase-out date of 2010 for the production and consumption
of methyl bromide was introduced and tighter controls were
agreed for HCFCs.
At the 9th Meeting of the Parties in 1997 which was
the tenth anniversary of the Montreal Protocol, the
consumption and production of levels for methyl bromide
were revised, bringing forward the phase-out date for
developed countries to 2005 and introducing a phases-out
date of 2015 for developing countries. Parties were also
required to introduce a licensing system for the import and
export of controlled substances.
The last meeting of the Parties that agreed an
amendment to the Protocol was the 11th Meeting in Beijing
in 1999, when an agreement was reached to phase out
bromochloromethane.
For a table of the international steps already taken
to protect the ozone layer click
here.
Main substances controlled by the Montreal Protocol,
their uses and some alternatives
Substance | Use | Some Alternatives |
CFC 11, 12, 113, 114, 115 | Refrigeration and air conditioning | HCFCs*, HFCs**, hydrocarbons,
ammonia |
CFC 11, 12, 113 | Foam blowing solvent | HCFCs*, pentane, HFCs**, various
alternatives e.g. aqueous cleaning
perchlorethylene |
CFC 11, 12, 114 | Aerosols | HFCs**, hydrocarbons, pump sprays |
Halons | Fire fighting | Water, CO
2, Inert gases, foam, HFCs** |
1,1,1 trichlorethane | Solvent | Various alternatives (see CFC 113
above) |
Carbon tetrachloride | Small scale laboratory uses | Various alternatives |
HCFCs* | Refrigeration, foam blowing | HFC*, hydrocarbons, pentane |
Methyl Bromide | Fumigation/pest control | No single alternative, for some
applications there might not yet be an
alternative |
* HCFCs are regarded as transitional replacements only.
They have some kind of ozone depleting potential, although
less than CFCs. They were brought under the control of the
Montreal Protocol in November 1992.
** HFCs contain no chloride and are not ozone
depleting substances, however they do contribute to climate
change.
Assessment and Review
The Parties to the Montreal Protocol have met annually
since 1992 and undertake major reviews of the control
measures at least every four years, on the basis of
available scientific, environmental, technical and economic
information. Advisory panels bring together experts from
science, industry, governments and non-governmental
organisations. The panels comprise:
· Two Scientific Assessment Panels, responsible for
reviewing scientific knowledge on ozone depletion and its
impacts
·The Technology and Economic Assessment Panel (TEAP),
which analyses the technical options for and the economic
costs of controlling the use of ozone depleting substances.
The TEAP functions largely through subsidiary technical
options committees, which cover separate areas: aerosols,
economic options, foams, halons, methyl bromide,
refrigeration and solvents.
In 1985, the UK Government's Department of the
Environment (now the Department for the Environment, Food
and Rural Affairs) and the Meteorological Office asked
several experts to form the UK Stratospheric Ozone Review
Group (SORG). The Group was asked to prepare a report that
addressed the main scientific issues concerning ozone
depletion in a form that would help the Government to
decide on the action needed to address the problem. Most
recently, the SORG met in 2002 to discuss methyl bromide
and the impact on ozone depletion.
© Crown, The Ozone Layer, Defra (2003)