On this page:

HMICS Thematic Inspection Productivity of police officers

« Previous | Contents | Next »

Listen

Annex B
Analysis of Survey Results

While this is not the first survey that we have carried out in support of a thematic inspection, it is the first time that we have done so using the internet. Although the inspection proper focused on police officers, we felt that it would be useful to allow all members of the police service in Scotland that wished to participate in the survey, to do so. As a result, some 2,440 responses were received. This is a tremendous response, bearing in mind that respondents required internet access and forces adopted a number of different approaches to publicise and support the survey.

As might be expected, the response was not uniform across forces and agencies and therefore our study group was not representative of the Service as a whole. This means that the results cannot be assumed to represent the views of the Service as a whole. We will consult with liaison officers in each force to learn any useful lessons that might help us in future surveys.

This annex does not present a full analysis of the survey, but rather gives a flavour of the results and some of the highlights. As intimated in our introduction, we intend to issue a separate report providing a detailed analysis of the survey results.

In considering the findings below, please be aware that where no answer was given to a question by respondents, these have been omitted from the analysis.

Q1. In which force or organisation are you currently working?

The overall number of responses received from all forces and other agencies (including Scottish Police Services Authority and ACPOS Secretariat) are shown in Table 4 below, together with their percentage share of total responses. Members of staff from the eight forces, and the SPSA, as well as officers on central service all responded to the survey.

Police force/agency

No. of respondents (%)

Central Scotland Police

64 (3%)

Dumfries & Galloway Constabulary

87 (4%)

Fife Constabulary

54 (2%)

Forensic Services

14 (1%)

Grampian Police

630 (27%)

Lothian & Borders Police

765 (32%)

Northern Constabulary

7 (0%)

Strathclyde Police

412 (17%)

Tayside Police

323 (14%)

Other Agencies

15 (1%)

Table 4

Q3. Which of the following best describes your role in your current force or organisation?

Total

Police officer, including special constable

1734 (73%)

Police support staff, including cadet

637 (27%)

Grand Total

2371 (100%)

Table 5

Q4. Please indicate your current rank.

Total

Constable

918 (53%)

Sergeant

453 (26%)

Inspector

242 (14%)

Chief Inspector and above

109 (6%)

Grand Total

1722 (100%)

Table 6

Responses from Chief Inspector and above include all ranks up to and including Chief Constable.

Q5. Different forces and organisations use different support staff categories and grades. Which of the following best describes the position you hold in your current force or organisation?

Total

Other police support staff

464 (73%)

Other police support staff - supervisory role

159 (25%)

Traffic warden - supervisory role

1 (0%)

Traffic warden

3 (0%)

Cadet

7 (1%)

Grand Total

634 (100%)

Table 7

Q7. Which of the following best describes the area of policing in which you work?

Police officer, including special constable

Police support staff, including cadet

Grand Total

Call/communication centre/control-room

66 (4%)

150 (25%)

216 (9%)

Community policing

153 (9%)

5 (1%)

158 (7%)

Community safety

72 (4%)

13 (2%)

85 (4%)

Crime investigation department

239 (14%)

28 (5%)

267 (12%)

Divisional/sub-divisional support functions

109 (6%)

83 (14%)

192 (8%)

Force HQ support functions

136 (8%)

136 (22%)

272 (12%)

Intelligence

134 (8%)

45 (7%)

179 (8%)

Operational patrol (e.g. uniform, foot/mobile)

513 (31%)

6 (1%)

519 (23%)

Road policing

113 (7%)

26 (4%)

139 (6%)

Other (please specify)

145 (9%)

118 (19%)

263 (11%)

Grand Total

1680 (100%)

610 (100%)

2290 (100%)

Table 8

Q8. How many years of service in the police service do you have? (Where applicable, please include any time you have spent in forces or police services other than your current place of work)

Police officer, including special constable

Police support staff, including cadet

Grand Total

Less than two years

47 (3%)

110 (18%)

157 (7%)

More than two years but less than ten years

304 (18%)

229 (38%)

533 (23%)

More than ten years but less than 20 years

661 (39%)

141 (23%)

802 (35%)

More 20 years but less than 25 years

330 (20%)

43 (7%)

373 (16%)

More than 25 years but less than 30 years

289 (17%)

21 (3%)

310 (14%)

More than 30 years

49 (3%)

66 (11%)

115 (5%)

Grand Total

1680 (100%)

610 (100%)

2290 (100%)

Table 9

Q9. How familiar are you with the National Intelligence Model or NIM as it is also called?

Police officer, including special constable

Police support staff, including cadet

Grand Total

Very

612 (37%)

48 (8%)

660 (29%)

Moderately

722 (43%)

114 (19%)

836 (37%)

Slightly

288 (17%)

212 (35%)

500 (22%)

Not at all

44 (3%)

230 (38%)

274 (12%)

Grand Total

1666 (100%)

604 (100%)

2270 (100%)

Table 10

Although the very and moderately familiar responses were encouraging, it was of some concern to us that 3% (44) of the responding police officers claimed to be not at all familiar with the National Intelligence Model. These officers consisted of three sergeants, 40 constables and one special constable and were spread across participating forces. Many classified themselves as being in operational roles. Of these same officers, only eight responded that they were not at all familiar with the tasking process in response to question 13. Since the majority did indicate some knowledge of the tasking process - including 12 claiming to be very familiar - it may be that the links between the terminology of NIM and its practical application have not always been understood or made clear during training or awareness sessions.

Q10. While on operational duty, do you ever have time that is NOT taken up attending incidents or conducting enquiries?

The response in Table 11 is based only on police officers.

Total

Yes

797 (48%)

No

290 (17%)

I do not carry out operational duties

579 (35%)

Grand Total

1666 (100%)

Table 11

If only officers who indicated that they carry out operational duties are considered, then Table 12 below suggests that some 73% (797) have some unallocated time.

Total

Yes

797 (73%)

No

290 (27%)

Grand Total

1087 (100%)

Table 12

Q11. Which of the following statements best describes how you use this unallocated time?

Total

On the majority of occasions I tend to decide myself what I should do

350 (45%)

On the majority of occasions I tend to direct my activities to dealing with any tasking received at briefings

263 (34%)

Other (please specify)

165 (21%)

Grand Total

778 (100%)

Table 13

It is interesting to note that of the officers who responded in Table 13 above, only 34% (263) perceived that on the majority of occasions their activity was directed towards tasking received at briefings. A large number - 21% (165) - gave an alternative explanation for how they directed their activities. These responses will be analysed in detail and commented on in our separate report.

Q12. And which one factor below is the most likely to influence the decision as to what to do with any unallocated time?

Total

Professional interest

97 (12%)

Knowledge and experience of policing

265 (34%)

Local knowledge of the area

98 (13%)

Identified community concerns

222 (29%)

Intuition

36 (5%)

Other (please specify)

60 (8%)

Grand Total

778 (100%)

Table 14

Q13. How familiar are you with your department, unit, division or force tasking process (e.g. who decides what tasking should be raised, how this is then allocated, how to respond and so on)?

Police officer, including special constable

Police support staff, including cadet

Grand Total

Very

915 (56%)

219 (37%)

1134 (51%)

Moderately

537 (33%)

202 (34%)

739 (33%)

Slightly

150 (9%)

117 (20%)

267 (12%)

Not at all

37 (2%)

60 (10%)

97 (4%)

Grand Total

1639 (100%)

598 (100%)

2237 (100%)

Table 15

Q14. How familiar are you with your organisational and/or local control strategy and its priorities?

Police officer, including special constable

Police support staff, including cadet

Grand Total

Very

704 (45%)

122 (22%)

826 (39%)

Moderately

590 (38%)

219 (39%)

809 (38%)

Slightly

227 (14%)

144 (26%)

371 (17%)

Not at all

47 (3%)

72 (13%)

119 (6%)

Grand Total

1568 (100%)

557 (100%)

2125 (100%)

Table 16

Q15. In your opinion, to what extent is there a link between your organisational and/or local control strategy priorities and what you do/how you carry out your daily activities?

Police officer, including special constable

Police support staff, including cadet

Grand Total

To a great extent

666 (42%)

154 (28%)

820 (39%)

To a moderate extent

573 (37%)

192 (34%)

765 (36%)

To a slight extent

224 (14%)

106 (19%)

330 (16%)

Don't know

35 (2%)

66 (12%)

101 (5%)

Not at all

70 (4%)

39 (7%)

109 (5%)

Grand Total

1568 (100%)

557 (100%)

2125 (100%)

Table 17

Q16. In your opinion, to what extent does having these priorities improve overall individual, team and organisational effectiveness i.e. what is achieved?

Individual effectiveness

Police officer, including special constable

Police support staff, including cadet

Grand Total

Very much

359 (23%)

156 (28%)

515 (24%)

Moderately

625 (40%)

193 (35%)

818 (38%)

Slightly

343 (22%)

92 (17%)

435 (20%)

Not at all

196 (13%)

32 (6%)

228 (11%)

Don't know

45 (3%)

84 (15%)

129 (6%)

Grand Total

1568 (100%)

557 (100%)

2125 (100%)

Table 18

Team effectiveness

Police officer, including special constable

Police support staff, including cadet

Grand Total

Very much

484 (31%)

188 (34%)

672 (32%)

Moderately

609 (39%)

186 (33%)

795 (37%)

Slightly

278 (18%)

74 (13%)

352 (17%)

Not at all

147 (9%)

25 (4%)

172 (8%)

Don't know

50 (3%)

84 (15%)

134 (6%)

Grand Total

1568 (100%)

557 (100%)

2125 (100%)

Table 19

Organisational effectiveness

Police officer, including special constable

Police support staff, including cadet

Grand Total

Very much

613 (39%)

213 (38%)

826 (39%)

Moderately

546 (35%)

172 (31%)

718 (34%)

Slightly

248 (16%)

65 (12%)

313 (15%)

Don't know

58 (4%)

89 (16%)

147 (7%)

Not at all

103 (7%)

18 (3%)

121 (6%)

Grand Total

1568 (100%)

557 (100%)

2125 (100%)

Table 20

Q17. Do you receive regular appraisals or other regular types of performance review, at least once a year? (For Questions 17-23, if you have been in your current post for less than a year and would not expect to have had an appraisal/review by this time, please answer this and following questions by drawing on experiences from your most recent previous post)

Police officer, including special constable

Police support staff, including cadet

Grand Total

Yes

1426 (91%)

487 (88%)

1913 (90%)

No

138 (9%)

68 (12%)

206 (10%)

Grand Total

1564 (100%)

555 (100%)

2119 (100%)

Table 21

Q18. How frequently do your appraisals and/or performance reviews take place? (Please tick as many as apply)

Police officer, including special constable

Police support staff, including cadet

Grand Total

Once a year

1252 (88%)

395 (83%)

1647 (87%)

Twice a year

79 (6%)

39 (8%)

118 (6%)

Every three months or quarter

45 (3%)

27 (6%)

72 (4%)

Monthly or more frequently

40 (3%)

16 (3%)

56 (3%)

Grand Total

1416 (100%)

477 (100%)

1893 (100%)

Table 22

Q19. Do your appraisals or other regular performance reviews tend to be completed on time?

Police officer, including special constable

Police support staff, including cadet

Grand Total

On most or all occasions

487 (35%)

237 (50%)

724 (38%)

On some occasions

605 (43%)

186 (39%)

791 (42%)

Rarely, if at all

319 (23%)

52 (11%)

371 (20%)

Grand Total

1411 (100%)

475 (100%)

1886 (100%)

Table 23

We were greatly concerned to learn of appraisals and performance reviews not being completed on time. This was particularly apparent amongst police officers. The failure of supervisors to complete appraisals within the required timescales has traditionally contributed to the overall failing of such systems since the relevance of this sort of review deteriorates rapidly over time. The figures were to some extent skewed by one force that managed to complete 70% of appraisals on time on most or all occasions. If the responses for this force are taken out then Table 24 below gives a more representative picture of the situation for our wider sample.

Police officer, including special constable

Police support staff, including cadet

Grand Total

On most or all occasions

328 (28%)

198 (48%)

526 (33%)

On some occasions

547 (46%)

169 (41%)

716 (45%)

Rarely, if at all

303 (26%)

47 (11%)

350 (22%)

Grand Total

1178 (100%)

414 (100%)

1592 (100%)

Table 24

Q20. During your appraisals or performance reviews, are personal objectives identified and set for you to achieve during the appraisal/review period?

Police officer, including special constable

Police support staff, including cadet

Grand Total

On most or all occasions

770 (55%)

306 (64%)

1076 (57%)

Sometimes

385 (27%)

103 (22%)

488 (26%)

Rarely, if at all

247 (18%)

58 (12%)

305 (16%)

Don't know

9 (1%)

8 (2%)

17 (1%)

Grand Total

1411 (100%)

475 (100%)

1886 (100%)

Table 25

Q21. And in your opinion, do you feel that your personal objectives are appropriate for you and your role?

Police officer, including special constable

Police support staff, including cadet

Grand Total

To a great extent

527 (37%)

185 (39%)

712 (38%)

To a moderate extent

551 (39%)

179 (38%)

730 (39%)

To a slight extent

213 (15%)

81 (17%)

294 (16%)

Not at all

120 (9%)

30 (6%)

150 (8%)

Grand Total

1411 (100%)

475 (100%)

1886 (100%)

Table 26

Q22. During your appraisals or performance reviews, is your performance subsequently assessed against these personal objectives?

Police officer, including special constable

Police support staff, including cadet

Grand Total

On most or all occasions

623 (44%)

240 (51%)

863 (46%)

Sometimes

432 (31%)

133 (28%)

565 (30%)

Rarely, if at all

314 (22%)

77 (16%)

391 (21%)

Don't know

42 (3%)

25 (5%)

67 (4%)

Grand Total

1411 (100%)

475 (100%)

1886 (100%)

Table 27

Table 28 below shows the responses for officers in the rest of Scotland having removed the two best performing forces.

Police officer, including special constable

On most or all occasions

240 (29%)

Sometimes

275 (33%)

Rarely, if at all

284 (34%)

Don't know

25 (3%)

Grand Total

824 (100%)

Table 28

Q23. In your opinion, does having set personal objectives have a positive influence on how well you do your job?

Objectives positive

Police officer, including special constable

Police support staff, including cadet

Grand Total

To a great extent

279 (20%)

110 (23%)

389 (21%)

To a moderate extent

511 (36%)

150 (32%)

661 (35%)

To a slight extent

302 (21%)

89 (19%)

391 (21%)

Not at all

287 (20%)

111 (23%)

398 (21%)

Other (please specify)

32 (2%)

15 (3%)

47 (2%)

Grand Total

1411 (100%)

475 (100%)

1886 (100%)

Table 29

Q24. Whether or not it is done regularly, when you are assessed to what extent do you feel that your performance is measured against specific force and/or local priorities?

Police officer, including special constable

Police support staff, including cadet

Grand Total

To a great extent

247 (16%)

73 (14%)

320 (15%)

To a moderate extent

538 (35%)

160 (30%)

698 (34%)

To a slight extent

410 (27%)

108 (20%)

518 (25%)

Not at all

308 (20%)

145 (27%)

453 (22%)

Don't know

28 (2%)

53 (10%)

81 (4%)

Grand Total

1531 (100%)

539 (100%)

2070 (100%)

Table 30

Q25. Thinking of the department, unit or division in which you work, in your opinion to what extent to you think good performance is praised?

Police officer, including special constable

Police support staff, including cadet

Grand Total

To a great extent

302 (20%)

101 (19%)

403 (19%)

To a moderate extent

602 (39%)

206 (38%)

808 (39%)

To a slight extent

490 (32%)

164 (30%)

654 (32%)

Not at all

136 (9%)

66 (12%)

202 (10%)

N/A - there is no particularly good performance

1 (0%)

2 (0%)

3 (0%)

Grand Total

1531 (100%)

539 (100%)

2070 (100%)

Table 31

Q26. And still thinking of the department, unit or division in which you work, in your opinion to what extent to you think poor performance is challenged?

Police officer, including special constable

Police support staff, including cadet

Grand Total

To a great extent

428 (28%)

92 (17%)

520 (25%)

To a moderate extent

547 (36%)

165 (31%)

712 (34%)

To a slight extent

381 (25%)

171 (32%)

552 (27%)

Not at all

119 (8%)

79 (15%)

198 (10%)

N/A - there is no particularly poor performance

56 (4%)

32 (6%)

88 (4%)

Grand Total

1531 (100%)

539 (100%)

2070 (100%)

Table 32

Q27. Please use this space to provide any further comment that you wish to make e.g. about what you feel are the main issues in this area, anything that we have have not covered but about which you feel strongly, or indeed anything that you feel may help us in this inspection.

A large number of respondents - 21% (491) - provided further comments. These will be analysed in detail and commented on in the separate report that will be issued on the survey.

« Previous | Contents | Next »

Page updated: Tuesday, April 29, 2008