« Previous | Contents | Next »
Listen
CHAPTER FOUR BEST PRACTICE REVIEW
Introduction
4.1 Over fifty projects, all containing elements of best
practice either in the provision of quality open spaces or
processes for a range of reasons, were identified in the
questionnaire responses. Respondents were asked to name any
projects that, in their view, demonstrated best practice
with regard to the use of standards or processes. All of
these projects have brought benefits to local communities
and the environment and should be commended. The following
sections set out the key lessons of the case study process,
which together with the literature review, informed the
findings and recommendations presented in chapters 6, 7 and
8. Chapter 5 contains a full summary of the questionnaire
responses.
4.2 The following ten case studies have been selected as
they provide important illustrations of the following:
- Local authority structures, which have facilitated
the setting of open space standards and developer
negotiations
Case Study 1: East Dunbartonshire
Council Greenspace Team
Case Study 2: Aberdeenshire Council
Community Orientated Developer Contributions
- Local authority approaches to the setting of open
space standards
Case Study 3: Dundee's Public Open
Space Strategy
Case Study 4: Stirling Council's
Development Advice Note
- Projects that set quality bench marks for public
open space
Case Study 5: Scottish Enterprise
Lanarkshire Gartcosh Nature Reserve
Case Study 6: MacRosty Park, Crieff
Case Study 7: The DrumResidential
Estate, Bo'ness
- Projects that demonstrate successful community
involvement in design and management
Case Study 8: Wilton Street, Glasgow,
Kelvin Clyde Greenspace
Case Study 9: The Hidden Gardens,
Glasgow
Case Study 10: Drumry Play Area, West
Dunbartonshire
CASE STUDY 1: East Dunbartonshire Council
Greenspace Team
Illustrates: Strategic approach by
local authority / value of a Greenspace
Officer / Community Planning and Local Plan
integration |
The Project The process to appoint a Greenspace Officer
for East Dunbartonshire Council (
EDC) began in 2001,
following a debate on the direction of the
Council's green space resource sparked by
internal pressures to ensure the delivery of
Best Value spending. These discussions tied in
with the Countryside Around Towns Review by
Scottish Natural Heritage. Although green space
upgrades and enhancement work had been
undertaken, they were progressed on a piecemeal
basis, often taking no account of the needs and
aspirations of the local community. An internal
staff reorganisation brought together two
Access Officers, a Biodiversity Officer and a
Greenspace Officer, based in the Planning
Department. Combined resources from Planning,
Education and Environment were used to match
fund resources available from Scottish Natural
Heritage to fund the additional post. Approach / Process The approach has worked well and the
following actions have resulted from the
setting up of the Team: - An interdepartmental Greenspace Forum
was set up, which meets monthly to review
progress, set targets and make decisions on
actions
- The first major task was to audit over
200 parks and green spaces to assess and
provide recommendations / actions for each
space
- A typology, based on the
PAN 65 typology, was
developed for all the 200 parks and green
spaces and a linked
GIS (Geographical
Information Systems) database
developed
- The Greenspace Audit received a
Commendation in the Scottish Executive /
RTPI 'Quality in
Planning' Award 2003
- The second major task involved the
development of a realistic and achievable
Greenspace Strategy, including a detailed
Action Plan, progressed through a series of
workshops involving a range of
EDC departments
(Environment, Community Planning, Connect
Services, Planning, Education etc.) and
external agencies (
SNH, Greenspace Scotland
etc.)
- Green space standards for new
residential developments will be
incorporated into the next Local Plan
- The Greenspace Strategy will be adopted
through the Local Plan process
|
Strengths - Interdepartmental approach to planning,
design & implementation of high quality
open spaces
- Meaningful inclusion of
EDC's Community Planning
partners in the process and input from
through a range of mechanisms involving
community representatives
- Platform from which planning
applications are assessed and influenced.
Standards will strengthen the decision
making process
- Integrated Greenspace team, well placed
to make informed decisions
- Policy adopted through the Local Plan
process
- Action Plan identifies future priority
projects
| Weaknesses - The existing set of standards were
prepared ahead of the Strategy process, to
meet another Council deadline
|
Opportunities - Additional benefit of fostering a much
clearer understanding of green space
issues
- The Strategy has raised the profile of
green space within the Council
|
Threats - Continuation of the Council commitment
to the process and internal resources
- Internal / external resources to fund
the Officer post
|
Key Lessons - One of the first Scottish local
authorities to complete the process of
developing an Open Space Strategy and
appoint a dedicated Greenspace Officer
- Consultative approach to Greenspace
Strategy development
- Formation of the Greenspace Working
Group, which has been hugely beneficial for
service delivery and provides connectivity
with wider strategies and Community
Planning
- Demonstrates good inter-departmental,
external agency and community partnership
working
- The Strategy process has established a
firm basis for reviewing open space
standards as they are included as a task in
the Action Plan, which has been agreed by
the relevant Council Departments
|
CASE STUDY 2: Aberdeenshire Council Community
Orientated Developer Contribution
Illustrates: Strategic thinking on
'planning gain' / developing a 'level
playing field' and transparency about
open space needs / working with Private
Sector / establishing structures for
funding |
The Project 5 years ago, Aberdeenshire Council appointed
a dedicated Planning Gain Officer to advise,
negotiate and collect contributions from
developers submitting planning applications.
The Council received the Quality in Planning
2002 Award for "Community Orientated Developer
Contributions", which the judges found to be an
admirable example of innovation in a difficult
area of planning. The Council's approach had
transformed the process of planning gain,
making it a fair and consistent means of
securing contributions for making good deficits
created within community infrastructure arising
from new development. It had extended planning
gain to all significant types of
development. Approach / Process At the start of the process, the developer
is invited to discuss the planning gain
implications of a proposed development, even
before they buy the land. The Planning Gain
Officer, who operates separately from the
Planning Department, has developed systems for
estimating the impact and requirement for
planning gain for each type of development
(local demand for parks, schools, community
buildings, sewerage, transportation, etc). The
requirement is that the calculation of planning
gain must be reasonable and linked to the
development. Planning gain funds are 'ring fenced' and
put into a separate named savings account in
the name of the developer. Each element of the
sum is apportioned for a particular use, for
example 50% is allocated to community
facilities or recreational provision etc.
Aberdeenshire Council has developed various
standards, such as school space standards and
libraries space standards, which are applied to
the proposed development. Currently, land value
in Aberdeenshire can absorb these costs. The
Planning Gain Officer administers the fund,
ensuring that the funds are spent within a five
year period or returned to the developer. The
monies can be used as match funding for other
funding streams. Examples of open space
provision include parks, woodlands,
recreational opportunities, path links and
amenity green space. |
Strengths - Joined-up thinking on open space,
community facilities and sports
provision
- Fair and transparent planning process
for developers
- Discussion and negotiation, which can
result in a both quantitative and
qualitative enhancement including higher
quality design
- Operates separately from the Planning
Department
- Enables the local authority to
positively influence the site layout
- Discussion of plans at an early stage
of development ensures that agreement can
be reached and high quality provision
achieved
- Allows planning infrastructure needs to
be factored into land values
| Weaknesses - Open space is considered along with
other infrastructure and community facility
requirements and may become a low priority
without the framework of an Open Space
Strategy / open space standards
approach
|
Opportunities - Delivery of multi-functional open
spaces and sports facilities in a
co-ordinated process
- Integration into larger area master
plan led and strategic land release
|
Threats - Officer acts at 'arms length' of the
Planning Department and success is
dependant on the strength of individual
Officer personality
- Continued Council support for the
post
|
Key Lessons - Use of Section 75 Agreements to secure
open space and other community
benefits
- Innovative ways of levering in funding
/ fixing budgets
- Effective negotiation with
developers
- Transparency of approach and building
up trust with developers
- Local communities and new communities
directly benefit form the funds
- The process has ensured that developers
make a contribution to the cost of public
services, which are made use of by their
development.
|
CASE STUDY 3: Dundee's Public Open Space
Strategy
Illustrates: Strategic approach by
local authority / value of open space
team / Community Planning / Local Plan
integration / setting of standards |
The Project In 1999, Dundee City Council published its
Public Open Space Strategy, with the aim of
ensuring that the City has an adequate
provision of open space in and around
communities that meets the needs of all. Eleven
Council departments and three external agencies
were involved in the strategic planning and
management of the city's open space. One
outcome of this strategic approach has been the
development of the Dundee Green Circular, a
landscaped footpath and cycleway which will
eventually encircle the City, providing
citizens and visitors with safe and attractive
links to parks, places of interest and open
countryside. The Council is concentrating on
country park and city parks, with a major
capital programme of 25% of the departments
capital spend and a rolling programme of park
upgrades. The Public Open Space strategy is
integral to the Local Plan so a legal basis has
been established, which is a valuable tool to
help decision making. The Strategy has had
other policy and initiative spin-offs, for
example, development of a Home Zone in Liff
hospital grounds, Ardler regeneration
initiative and regeneration of Baxter Park back
to the original design of Sir Joseph Paxton.
The Council aims to set up "Friends of groups"
for each park. Approach / Process The outcome of the Open Space Audit and
Strategy is the development of the 'Dundee
Standard', which sets open space standards for
different city zones. The application of this
standard has identified open space deficiencies
throughout the city, which will be addressed
through developer contributions / Section 75
agreements and other Council projects. The
Strategy has been completed, setting out the
following: - A three-year action plan for
safeguarding and improving public open
spaces
- An open space hierarchy ranging from
spaces with a city-wide function to those
serving neighbourhood and local
requirements
- Accessibility standards and management
objectives for each level of open space
provision
- A requirement for the development of
master plans for all of the major parks in
Dundee
Work is underway to develop the actions that
have come out of the Action Plan,
including: - The development of further strategies,
including a pitch strategy
- A wider footpath network is being
developed, under the City Council's Paths
for All Initiative, using the Green
Circular as a spine
|
Strengths - Well documented strategy with tasks,
actions and timescales
- Commitment from eleven Council
departments
- Development of the Dundee partnership
for the Environment
- Budgetary and staff commitment
- Achieves Community Planning aims
- Customers are given information cards
and user counters have been installed in
parks
| Weaknesses - There did not appear to be any
significant weaknesses
|
Opportunities - Changing attitudes - Parks are about
people
- Parks and gardens are now considered as
'local open air leisure centres'
|
Threats - Continuation of the Council commitment
to the process and internal resources
|
Key Lessons - Strong Council internal
partnerships
- Clear structure for establishing
standards
- Development of locally relevant
policies, actions and targets
- Continuing community involvement and
consultation throughout the process
- Clear leadership, Council commitment
and political backing
- Changing attitudes within departments,
local communities and maintenance
teams
- Strategic policies helping to lever in
external funding and target internal
resources
- An information pack for each city zone
has been prepared for local developers,
ensuring the process is transparent and
allows Development Control Officers a level
of flexibility
- Standards work best when developed in a
manner that responds to local need and
opportunity
|
CASE STUDY 4: Stirling Council's Development
Advice Note
Illustrates: Strategic approach by
local authority / preparation of design
guidance and local standards / Local
Plan integration |
The Project In July 2004, Stirling Council prepared a
Development Advice Note (
DAN) for "Play and Informal
Recreation Areas in Association with New
Housing Areas" in an effort to help the
applicant better understand the Council's
current policies on various aspects of open
space development. This Development Advice Note
supplements the Council's Development Plan
Policy and sets out the Council's policy on
open space in new residential developments. The
DAN is one of a number of
advice notes available online for a range of
planning subjects, including the layout and
design of new housing developments and
protecting and managing trees on development
sites. The advice note clearly sets out the
aspiration of the Council to ensure the
"provision of high quality public open space,
including play and informal recreation areas,
in and close to residential areas." Advice is
concentrated on two of the nine categories set
out in
PAN 65, namely play space
for children and young people and amenity green
space used for informal active recreation such
as 'kick-a-bouts'. A guideline quantity
standard is set out, based on the National
Playing Fields 6 acre standard, which equates
to 20m
2 per household divided between
informal play/ recreation space and equipped
play areas. The decision making for site requirements
will take into account the following: - Existing provision - the quantity,
quality and accessibility of existing play
and informal recreation areas in the
locality
- An assessment of current and future
requirements including existing
deficiencies and the scale and type of the
proposed housing development
A range of mechanisms for provision of
facilities is set out in the document, to allow
developers to meet the required standards for
play and informal recreation provision, which
include off-site or on-site provision or a
combination of both. The minimum value of the
provision per house is stated to allow
calculation of the level of planning gain
required for a development. The preferred
mechanism is for the developer to pay an agreed
sum to the Council. Adoption by the Council is
the preferred maintenance option. A set of
design guidelines comment on the required
quality and design of the recreation and play
provision, including location, accessibility,
timing, context and equipment. |
Strengths - Good, clearly set out advice, which
adds transparency to the development
control procedures of the Council
- On-site / off-site flexibility of open
space provision is very good
- Set of clearly defined design
guidelines, with detailed advice containing
lots of useful elements
- Requires the design of new developments
to take into account existing open space
and undertake an assessment of current and
future requirements
- Clear standards for new build housing
referenced back to financial value
| Weaknesses - Applies to only residential
developments and limited to a few types of
open spaces
|
Opportunities - Allows a level of negotiation and
flexibility at the start of the planning
process to ensure that opportunities for
play and amenity space provision are
maximised
|
Threats - Continuation of the Council commitment
to enforce the standards and ensure that
quality open spaces are achieved
|
Key Lessons - Transparent planning guidance and
process development
- The level of provision for a particular
site and level of planning gain can be
assessed at the outset of the project
- Clearly presented guidance and advice
for developers securing a level playing
field
- Addressing costs/value
transparently
A number of local authorities are in the
process of setting out local standards for open
space in new residential developments, however,
the Stirling model demonstrates a clearly
defined approach with enough flexibility to
ensure that new developments are not required
to conform to a blueprint. |
CASE STUDY 5: Scottish Enterprise Lanarkshire
Gartcosh Nature Reserve
Illustrates: Strategic approach
based on a more sustainable development
model / partnership working / open
space provision within industrial site
/ public access / integrated training /
demonstration project |
The Project The 90ha derelict site of the former
Gartcosh Steelworks in Lanarkshire is being
redeveloped by a partnership of interests
including Scottish Enterprise Lanarkshire,
North Lanarkshire Council (
NLC) and Scottish Natural
Heritage. It is hoped that the multi-million
pound project will create 170,000 square metres
of new business space and support up to 5,000
new jobs. Planned economic benefits have been
integrated with wider considerations of
sustainable transportation, waste and energy
management, biodiversity, the needs of
surrounding communities and environmental
enhancement. The need to balance the
requirements of development with a highly
significant nature conservation interest was
central to the master planning process. The
development model combines a 50ha mixed
Business Park and inter-modal transport
interchange, linked to bus routes, cycleways
and footpaths, with the creation of a new 27ha
Local Nature Reserve. Provision has been made
to include: - Path linkages including access to
employment/transport together with
recreational routes
- Open space provision providing amenity
for site employees including
seating/circular walks
- High amenity, high biodiversity open
space integrating
SUDS and habitat
creation
- 10 year Management Plan for the Local
Nature Reserve supported by funding
agreements
Approach / Process The initial stage of the process involved
developing a master plan capable of addressing
all stakeholder requirements and balancing the
needs for economic development, social
infrastructure and environment. Recognition of
the need to secure transparency and
accountability led to an early decision to
secure a Partnership Agreement between the key
stakeholders (
SE Lanarkshire/North
Lanarkshire Council/Scottish Natural Heritage)
and framed within a detailed legal Minute of
Agreement. Detailed planning consents were
obtained, along with an Animal Conservation
Licence (
SEERAD) to allow Great
Crested Newt translocation by a team of
ecologists. Work included creation of a new
Local Nature Reserve with public access capable
of meeting local recreational, educational and
conservation needs and capable of supporting
habitat suitable for a wide variety of species
including protected flora and fauna (Great
Crested Newt and other amphibians, otters,
dragonflies, damselflies and breeding birds,
rare plant species, bats, badgers and water
voles) and rare and regionally important
species and communities. A high level of
community participation has also been an
important element of the Gartcosh project with
statutory, non-statutory and local
stakeholders. |
Strengths - Effective partnership working between a
number of stakeholder groups and the local
community
- Regeneration of former industrial land
and the creation of a nature reserve
- Commitment to the environment, whilst
bringing economic benefits to the local
community
- Use of innovative ecological
translocation techniques of habitats and
protected species
- Some 50,000 tonnes of waste has been
recycled
- Nearly 100 training places have been
generated on contracts through the
operation of a voluntary charter agreement
between Scottish Enterprise and works
contractors
- Training of
NLC maintenance staff in
highly specialised ecological maintenance
and surveys
| Weaknesses - Restricting public access to the
habitat areas during initial phases of
development
|
Opportunities - Long term ecological watching brief and
onsite ecology supervision
- Specialist training opportunities for
NLC maintenance
teams
- Educational opportunities for local
schools, through
NLC Ranger Service
|
Threats - Protection of a sensitive habitat may
not be compatible with public access to
these areas
- The specialist maintenance requirements
of the
NR may be difficult to
sustain long term
|
Key Lessons - Demonstrates how a large-scale
infrastructure project can provide real
benefits in terms of the economic,
environmental and social elements of
sustainable development
- Working with industry to protect open
space and sensitive habitats
- Pioneering Scottish protection and
translocation of a European Protected
Species
- Establishment of a highly complex
habitat to safeguard the successful
movement of protected species
|
CASE STUDY 6: MacRosty Park, Crieff
Illustrates: Partnership working /
community involvement through 'Friends'
group / historic restoration project /
quality bench mark for public open
space |
The Project Opened in 1902, MacRosty Park encompassing
7.6 hectares of parkland, is arguably the most
picturesque in Scotland, with a fine collection
of mature trees and the Turret Burn flowing
through it. The park is named after its
benefactor, Provost James Macrosty, who gifted
the land. There are a range of recreational
activities, including sports field, band stand,
trampolines, tennis courts, pitch-and-put,
picnic areas, car park and two children's play
areas. Lady Mary's Walk begins from the car
park, which is a beautiful beech lined avenue
running alongside the River Earn, gifted to the
town by Sir Patrick Murray of Ochtertyre House
in 1815. Today the park is owned and managed by
Perth & Kinross Council and has just
celebrated its centenary. At one time the park
was referred to as "The Jewel in the Crown" of
Perthshire parks dues to the superb location,
layout, magnificent trees and floral displays.
Sadly, in recent years the park has slipped
into a state of decline due to a lack of
investment. The 'Friends of MacRosty Park' was
established in 2003 with the purpose of
regenerating and redeveloping the park, in
partnership with Perth & Kinross Council.
The Friends Group is actively involved in the
management of the park. Approach / Process The impetus to establish the Friends Group
came from owners of local tourism businesses,
who were being asked by visitors on a regular
basis why the sporting facilities were closed
and why the Park had fallen into such a poor
state of repair. The local Tourist Office had
also received complaints from visitors to the
town. These concerns prompted local residents
to contact the local Councillors, the police
and the Council to see if the situation could
be improved. Over forty people attended a
meeting in the Town Hall, called by the local
Councillors to discuss the problems in the
park. Ten people were selected to form a
committee, which later became the 'Friends of
MacRosty Park' Group. Extensive community
consultation has been undertaken by the
'Friends' group, including a survey of park
users in summer 2004. In 2003, Perth and
Kinross Council reopened the tennis courts,
trampolines, putting green and refreshments
pavilion at weekends from Easter and during the
week in school holidays. Since then,
consultants have been appointed to work with
the 'Friends' group and the Council to prepare
a restoration master plan for submission to the
Heritage Lottery Fund (
HLF) for a grant under its
Public Parks Initiative. |
Strengths - A level of community policing and
involvement has been maintained
- Community-led initiative in partnership
working with the Council and local
agencies
- Developing a sense of local 'ownership'
of the park
- MacRosty Park has the potential to
offer a very special quality of place
linking the legacy of the past with the
needs of present and future
generations
- A level of community policing has been
effective in curbing vandalism, graffiti
and anti-social behaviour
| Weaknesses - Park buildings, equipment and planting
displays may be costly to maintain
|
Opportunities - Provision of high quality community
events space
- Potential to involve local people of
all ages in a variety of projects within
the park
- Provision of historic and environmental
education opportunities
|
Threats - Unsuccessful application to
HLF and other match
funders
- Commitment of long term budgets for
specialist maintenance of the restored
park
- Summer staff resource to run the
recreational facility is dependant on
annual budgets
|
Key Lessons - Community led initiative, in
partnership with the local authority, Visit
Scotland, local schools and various
community groups
- The influence and power of a local
community group in effecting change
- 'Friends of the Park' groups can be an
effective vehicle for regenerating
parks
- Community involvement in the
maintenance of a park
|
CASE STUDY 7: The Drum Residential Estate,
Bo'ness
Illustrates: Master plan approach
to development / quality bench mark for
residential open space |
The Project The Drum residential development is situated
on the outskirts of Bo'ness, approximately
eighteen miles west of Edinburgh. The phased
development has been progressed through an
innovative master-planning and urban design
process to set the residential estate within a
new high quality landscape setting. The
landowner was determined to find a way of
controlling the quality of development, of
being sympathetic to the context and local
character whilst establishing high standards of
architecture and urban design. The now
partially complete housing development
includes: a serpentine park with play and
recreation facilities; structure planting
providing an enclosed setting of native trees
and shrubs; incidental landscape areas in the
semi-private back court parking areas; and
avenues along the main spine roads. The park
stretches through the heart of the development,
connecting to the countryside to the north and
south eastern corners of the site. As well as
providing amenity planting, the park will have
a play ground within walking distance of all
phases of development, a series of waterways
and a shallow pond. Approach / Process Each phase of the development has been
designed with a special sense of place,
reflected in the building design, layout and
landscape treatment. Particular emphasis has
been placed on composition of individual homes
into groups and into street fronts. Phase 1 has
radiating roads, carefully composed street
elevations and a traditional character. Phase 2
has groups of houses surrounding small private
courtyards and a village green. Phase 3 has a
Georgian style circus of houses around a
central garden and paired houses on the south
facing slope. The final phases of the
development will include a central public
square and garden, with access to the park and
panoramic views across the Firth of Forth. The completed streetscape realises a number
of urban design objectives including: - Minimising the impact of car parking
whilst meeting local standards
- Providing coherent and well defined
streets, providing incident and variety in
the streetscape
- Well connected open spaces and
parkland
- A distinctive layout and density for
each phase, using architectural forms and
materials which are modern but sympathetic
to the architecture of coastal towns
The vision has been developed by creating an
innovative procurement process, involving urban
design frameworks, design/bid competitions and
a partnership approach as a means of securing
development quality. All houses have sold
successfully and quickly, meeting the
developers targets. |
Strengths - Joined-up thinking in open space,
community facilities and sports provision
through the master planning process
- Provision of attractive well set out
open spaces throughout the estate, with a
hierarchy of spaces for defined public /
semi-private uses
- Demonstrates that an attractive
landscape setting increases the saleability
of properties
| Weaknesses - The first phases of the development
have included only parts of the overall
open space provision, therefore the
serpentine parks would be jeopardised if
the latter phases of the development were
not completed
|
Opportunities - Provide a best practice model for
development of other residential and
business developments
|
Threats - Commitment of long term budgets for
maintenance of the landscape and after care
arrangements
|
Key Lessons - Innovative procurement methods and
master planning to achieve a high quality
residential development set within a
functional and attractive landscape
setting
|
CASE STUDY 8: Wilton
Street, Glasgow, Kelvin Clyde
Greenspace
Illustrates: Strategic Approach by
Local Authority / Value of Openspace
Officer / Community Planning &
Local Plan integration |
The Project Wilton Street Gardens are set in the heart
of Glasgow's West End in a small pocket of
Council owned green space in a densely
populated tenemented residential area.
Inappropriate use of the green space, which was
locked and contained only grass and rows of
standard trees, prompted a local resident to
contact Kelvin Clyde Greenspace for advice on
improving the site and resolving the conflicts
and issues of the site. This initial
consultation prompted sufficient local interest
to form a constituted steering group of local
residents. Initially a range of low cost
proposals were developed, to increase the
diversity and interest of the site, but a
successful application to the Beechgrove Garden
television programme raised the profile and
aspirations of the group. Work commenced on
site in July 2003 and was completed in late
August, with support from Glasgow City Council
and Kelvin Clyde Greenspace. Approach / Process The public consultation process was
facilitated by Kelvin Clyde Greenspace,
initially involving a chain saw sculptor that
attracted over 100 people to a consultation
event, during which community aspirations were
gauged. A constituted steering group was
assembled from those attending the consultation
event. The group approached the Beechgrove
Garden television programme and the project was
accepted as a community improvement scheme. A
Beechgrove designer prepared a design for the
gardens, in association with the steering
group, following visits to other gardens to
gather ideas. Funding, the necessary agreements
and in-kind support was secured and project
implementation began. Trainees from Glasgow
City Council's Land Services Department built
the paths and hard landscaping areas, with the
local community providing other skills and
labour. The completed garden has been described as a
'chic Parisian-style green space', with formal
paths, parterres, flower beds and wildlife
garden areas. The involvement and commitment of
neighbouring residents continues with the
steering group continuing to have a significant
input into site management. It is considered
that the key outcome of the project is the
coming together of a previously disparate
community. The site continues to provide a
focus for community activity. |
Strengths - Increased cohesion and increased
community spirit
- Successful partnership working of the
local community, the Council and the local
greenspace trust
- 'Bottom up' approach to environmental
projects
- Creating opportunities for employment,
training, work experience and
volunteering
- Encouraging use of open space for
health and informal recreation
- Environmental enhancement of an area
previously inaccessible to the local
community
- Provision of an attractive and
manageable local green space
- An anecdotal rise in the value of
neighbouring properties, in the order of
£30,000
| Weaknesses - Implementation programme was tied into
filming timescales
- Long term maintenance is reliant on
Council budgets
- Complicated use of materials and design
may be expensive to maintain and
repair
|
Opportunities - Created a model for other
communities
- May inspire other local communities to
initiate similar projects
- One of the committee now runs an
organic vegetable growing slot on the
Beechgrove Garden programme
|
Threats - Key community steering group members
may move away from the area in time
- Insurance implications of community
group taking management responsibility for
the site
|
Key Lessons - Developing community pride and
involvement through environmental
projects
- Making green space social space
- Fostering understanding and
appreciation of the environment
- Developing a sense of local 'ownership'
of the gardens
|
CASE STUDY 9: The Hidden Gardens,
Glasgow
Illustrates: Transformation of
derelict land / partnership working /
community involvement in design and
management |
The Project The hidden Gardens is Scotland's first
contemporary sacred garden, located in South
Glasgow's Pollockshields and Govanhill area.
The independent arts charity called the nva
organisation, spent two years developing a
0.8ha derelict industrial site into the
sanctuary gardens to the rear of the Tramway
Theatre. The project was completed in 2003. The
project was a collaborative venture, involving
the arts charity, landscape architects, an
international team of artists, in consultation
with a diverse local community. The project has
entailed the creation of a unique public green
space that celebrates the diverse cultures of
Glasgow's population. The space includes a
series of gardens incorporating land sculpture,
installation and poetry artworks, which form an
integral part of the overall design. A network
of paths connects the spaces, leading the
visitor through the gardens along lit pergolas
and to a raised viewing platform. The gardens
incorporate many design elements both
throughout history and across cultures. A range
of plant species have been chosen to reflect
the diversity of culture, including oak,
oriental plane and pines, hawthorns and rowans
from Scotland and Asia. The former industrial
buildings, now converted into theatre use and
the landmark 100ft chimney provide a historic
reference. The former boiler house has been
converted for use as offices, a plant training
nursery, demonstration beds and a community
headquarters. The gardens are one of the first
permanent public gardens to be developed
through a large-scale artistic collaboration.
Since opening in June 2003, the gardens have
attracted over 20,000 visitors. Approach / Process A twelve month consultation period in East
Pollokshields and Govanhill with over fifty
local organisations shaped the direction of the
design for the Hidden Gardens and what a garden
should offer the local community, as well as
international visitors. The area is home to a
vibrant mixture of cultures and faiths, many of
which have strong horticultural traditions. - Workshops were conducted with 6 local
schools
- Visits were made to the different faith
groups represented in the local area
Twenty-five partner organisations joined
together to fund the initial site clearance,
construction phase and three year events and
workshops programme of this £1,000,000 project.
This includes the creation of permanent jobs
for a head gardener, horticultural support team
and resource manager. The partners include the
National Lottery Artists' Work in Public Places
Scheme, Glasgow City Council and a wide variety
of public and private sources. |
Strengths - The design approach allows flexibility
for change as the garden develops over
time
- Expensive community consultation should
sustain its future in the longer term
- The gardens are a welcome addition to
the Tramway Theatre, providing an
attractive outdoor café space
- The gardens have provided training
opportunities for two school vocational
trainees in hard and soft landscaping
| Weaknesses - The various elements of the gardens may
be expensive to repair and maintain
|
Opportunities - Extending the current educational and
training opportunities offered to the local
community
- Use of the environmental and artistic
resource by local schools
|
Threats - Reliance on public and local authority
sources of funding to sustain its use
|
Key Lessons - Community inclusion and consultation
throughout the process
- Partnership working, drawing on the
strengths of a wide range of funding and
professional, public and charitable
organisations
- Development of a long term community
resource, providing training and
educational opportunities
- Providing outdoor flexible community
events space
- Regeneration of derelict land and
provision of a valuable community green
space
|
CASE STUDY 10: Drumry Play Area, West
Dunbartonshire
Illustrates: Transformation of
derelict land / partnership working /
community involvement in design and
management |
The Project In 2001, West Dunbartonshire Council
appointed consultants to undertake an
Environmental Appraisal of the sixteen Social
Inclusion Partnership areas within the Council
area. The Drumry Social Inclusion Partnership
area is located along the A82 Great Western
Road to the west of Glasgow. At the time of the
survey, the open space facilities were limited
to a blaes five-aside pitch along Vanguard
Street and a small play area set within a large
grassed open space along the A82 road corridor.
A corridor of scrub between the backs of the
houses along Vanguard Street and Montrose
Street had become a dumping ground and a
drug-users hang-out area, accessed though the
Vanguard street blaes pitch. Other social
problems included gang warfare with rival gangs
from neighbouring Drumchapel. A community consultation meeting, held in
the local school, established that there were
not enough opportunities for recreational
activities within the residential estate. The
local aspiration for the open spaces in the
area included the following: - Diversification of the open spaces
within the estate to improve the general
built environment
- Provision of a play area for young
children
- Provision of a multi-user play facility
for children aged 0-16 at the Vanguard
Street pitch
A small group of parents who live in the
area set up the Drumry Recreation Activity
Group (
DRAG), with the objective of
turning the derelict pitch area into a
multi-user play facility for all ages and
abilities. The group organised a community
consultation event, involving young people from
the area, with the assistance of the West
Dunbartonshire Partnership and West
Dunbartonshire Greenspace. - The young people got involved on the
committee
- The group organised site visits to
parks in Glasgow
- Care was taken to ensure the play area
is suitable for children with
disabilities
The outcome is a multi-activity facility,
which is well lit and designed, including a zip
line, roundabout, climbing tower, sports wall,
fenced ballpark and slide. |
Strengths - Community involvement will ensure a
level of community policing of the
facility, which should sustain its future
in the longer term
- Value of a local community group in
effecting change
- Developing a sense of local 'ownership'
and pride
- Encouraging use of open space for
health and recreation
- Greater sense of safety and
security
- Aiming to address the needs of local
young people
| Weaknesses - Long term maintenance is reliant on
Council budgets
|
Opportunities - Potential to involve local people of
all ages in future regeneration
projects
- Created a model for other
communities
- May inspire other local communities to
initiate similar projects
|
Threats - Commitment of long term budgets for
specialist maintenance of the park
- Key community steering group members
may move away from the area in time
|
Key Lessons - Regeneration of local community
facilities through a community led
initiative, in partnership with the local
authority
- Derelict land being successfully
transformed by the community for the
community
- Successful partnership working and
engagement with young people and
children
- Local people continue to be actively
involved in the management and maintenance
of the site
- Demonstration of commitment and
involvement of local community groups
|
Delivering Sustainable Quality
4.3 The questionnaire and interview consultation process
identified a common sense of concern about the standard of
open space with almost as many poor examples of open space
as examples where open spaces work well. Discussions with
council officers, house builders and professionals
repeatedly highlighted common areas of failing that appear
to exist across a range of open space, leading to a gradual
decline of levels of open space / facilities / quality over
a period of decades. Open spaces are not considered to be
'fit for purpose' when they:
- Do not provide appropriate facilities;
- Do not meet the needs of local people;
- Are unsafe and involve crossing major roads;
- Provide too much open space of limited quality and
function;
- Adversely affect community identity and perceptions
of open space function;
- Are poorly designed (siting, layout, materials) eg.
low quality fences / equipment, which are easily
vandalised, poor lighting / security offering very
limited natural surveillance or user security;
- Do not take maintenance requirements into account
during the design process;
- Are poorly managed;
- Are unusable because of vandalism, dog-fouling,
glass and litter; and
- Suffer from abuse eg. fly-tipping, anti-social
behaviour, vandalism.
4.4 Three main themes repeat themselves and appear to
offer systemic reasons for failure, which are as
follows:
Lack of Clear Design Briefs and Open Space
Objectives
4.5 Consultees identified failing and failed open spaces
with fundamental decisions regarding the provision
(location/ design requirement/ standard) of open space
which were often not well co-ordinated between provider
(whether local authority/developer/ public agency) and the
likely end user. A more customer focussed approach linked
to a clear understanding of the objectives, design
requirement and specification for open space is an
important part of securing standards. Lack of local
consultation and the use of local knowledge creates
provision that poorly reflect local need with the inherent
increased risk of failure.
Inability to Secure Design Quality including Design
for Sustainability
4.6 Good design is critical to securing quality open
spaces that are fit for purpose, durable and address a
breadth of user, stakeholder and maintainer needs. Good
quality open space is often multi-functional and offers
capacity through good design to meet a diversity of
requirements within a single site
(biodiversity/amenity/sports & leisure function). Good
design requires good designers developing design through
consultation with time and funding appropriate to the
complexity of the design task. Standards need to express a
commitment to design quality and sustainable solutions.
Failed Maintenance
4.7 Consultees mentioned the failure of open space
maintenance most frequently as one of the major issues of
open space and involving all aspects from lack of
design/maintenance co-ordination, simple failure to
maintain, limited maintenance budgets all impacting on the
usability of open space. The increasing cost of providing
endowment funding and problems with factoring were also
mentioned. Developing standards must address long term
maintenance and management.
« Previous | Contents | Next »