| Description | Circular 10/1999 |
|---|
| ISBN | n/a (Web Only) |
|---|
| Official Print Publication Date | |
|---|
| Website Publication Date | April 09, 1999 |
|---|
Circular 10/1999
The Chief Executive Local Authorities
Our ref: PGC/8/8
Copy to: The Director of Planning
9 April 1999
This Circular supersedes SDD Circular
23/1973
Dear Sir/Madam
PLANNING AND NOISE
INTRODUCTION
1. This Circular sets out Government policy on the role
of the planning system in controlling noise. It is
accompanied by Planning Advice Note 56: Planning and Noise.
The PAN sets out advice and best practice on the range of
issues of which planning authorities should be aware in
formulating development plans, making decisions on planning
applications and in taking enforcement action to maintain
and enhance environmental quality. This Circular has effect
from 1 May 1999, superseding Circular 23/1973 Planning and
Noise and the accompanying memorandum 24/1973.
GENERAL PRINCIPLES
2. Noise can have a significant effect on the
environment and on the quality of life enjoyed by
individuals and communities. The control of noise is
achieved primarily through environmental protection
legislation. The major legislative instruments are
Part lll of the Environmental Protection Act
1990, which requires local authorities to serve
abatement notices where the noise emitted from any premises
constitutes a "statutory nuisance"; and
Part lll of the Control of Pollution Act
1974, which gives local authorities powers to
control noise from construction sites, and also introduced
the concept of the Noise Abatement Zone (NAZ).
Implementation of this legislation usually falls to the
Environmental Health Department of a local authority.
Further information on these and other noise control
regimes is contained in Annex 4 to PAN 56.
3. The bodies and authorities responsible for offering
advice or for implementing these controls (usually the
local authority Environmental Health Department) will often
have expertise and experience which planning authorities
may find helpful in assessing development proposals. In
some cases it will be important for planning authorities to
liaise with the relevant body because some part of the
activity for which planning permission has been sought may
be subject to another more appropriate means of control or
licensing condition. The planning permission should not
seek to duplicate such controls.
4. It is not the purpose of the planning system to
intervene in existing noise problems arising from lawful
land use activity. However, the planning system has a role
to play in preventing and minimising the impact of noise
through its influence over the location and design of new
developments. It should aim to do this without placing
unreasonable restrictions on development or adding unduly
to the costs and administrative burdens of business.
5. Land use planning has the task of guiding development
to the most appropriate locations. Housing, hospitals,
educational establishments, offices and some livestock
farms should generally be regarded as noise-sensitive land
uses. In general, the aim should be to separate
noise-sensitive developments from major sources of noise.
Accordingly new development which generates a high level of
noise or involves noisy activities or processes should,
where possible, be sited away from noise-sensitive land
uses. Planning authorities should also consider whether
proposals for new noise-sensitive development would be
compatible with existing activities and land uses in an
area. To assist authorities in their consideration of new
housing developments against noise generated by different
modes of transport, recommended standards are set out in
Annex 1 to the PAN. These standards are set in relation to
a range of Noise Exposure Categories which are explained in
the PAN. Planning authorities are expected to have regard
to these standards in reaching development control
decisions.
6. Development necessary for the creation of jobs and
the construction and improvement of essential
infrastructure will often generate noise. However,
acknowledging the economic dimension of sustainable
development, planning authorities should ensure that the
planning system does not place obstacles in the way of such
development without good reason.
7. While it may be possible to mitigate the adverse
effects of noise, noise-sensitive development will rarely
be appropriate in areas which are already subject to
unacceptably high levels of noise or are expected to become
so. Some sites may be subject to night-time noise at a
level that is little below the day-time level, for example
because of night-time deliveries or shift changes. These
sites deserve special attention and noise-sensitive
development should be discouraged where high levels of
noise will occur either intermittently or continuously
during the night.
DEVELOPMENT PLANS
8. Development plans should give developers and local
communities a degree of certainty about the particular
types of development that will or will not be acceptable in
particular areas. Local communities need to have confidence
that their amenity will not be undermined by new
development that generates high levels of noise. Thus, as
far as noise is concerned, the main function of development
plans, in particular local plans, is to ensure that new
development which is sensitive to noise is not located
close to noisy activities. Development plans should:
- guide noise-sensitive developments away from
existing sources of significant noise or from
programmed development such as new roads or areas
reserved for noisy uses or activities; and
- ensure that potentially noisy developments are
located in areas where noise will not be such an
important consideration or where its impact can be
contained or minimised.
9. Properly justified and clearly worded policies can do
a great deal to reduce the risk of intrusion of noisy
development on those sensitive uses or more expansive areas
that are valued for their tranquillity. In addition, the
possibility of controlling, removing or re-siting existing
sources of noise should not be overlooked.
10. Noise is a complex issue requiring specialist
knowledge and training. Accordingly, such policies should
be formulated in close consultation with local authority
Environmental Health Departments or other specialist
advisers.
DEVELOPMENT CONTROL
11. Where relevant, noise should be acknowledged as a
material consideration in the determination of planning
applications. While development plans provide the policy
framework within which noise issues can be considered, more
detailed assessment of these issues will be required when
individual applications for planning permission are
considered. Where it is not possible or practicable to
separate noisy and noise sensitive land uses, planning
authorities should consider how the impact of noise can be
reduced through the layout and design of plant, buildings
and site engineering or by regulating the nature or timing
of on-site activities.
12. Where appropriate, planning conditions should be
attached to planning permissions which would reduce the
adverse impact of noise, and enable development to proceed
where it would otherwise be necessary to refuse planning
permission. SODD Circular 4/1998 sets out Government policy
and guidance on the use of conditions in planning
permissions. The addendum to Circular 4/1998 contains some
examples of model conditions on noise. Further advice on
conditions related to noise is set out in Annex 3 to the
PAN. Again, Environmental Health Departments should be
consulted in the preparation of conditions relating to
noise.
13. Where a proposed development is likely to generate a
significant amount of noise or have a significant impact on
noise-sensitive development planning authorities should
require developers to prepare a Noise Impact Assessment.
Such assessments should demonstrate whether a noise problem
is likely to occur, the nature and implications of the
problem and identify measures for its control or
mitigation. Paragraph 14 of the PAN contains further advice
on this matter.
14. Planning authorities should try to avoid the
possible consequences of noise-sensitive development
encroaching on the operation of established businesses, or
other land uses, which generate significant levels of
noise.
MONITORING AND ENFORCEMENT
15. Where conditions have been set to limit noise these
should be monitored on a regular basis. Once again,
planning authorities should liaise with Environmental
Health Departments in monitoring compliance with noise
conditions and in establishing the need to take enforcement
action.
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS
16. Many of Scotland's rural areas possess an
environmental quality from which people derive a range of
benefits. Such areas, and the flora and fauna within them,
may be sensitive to any form of intrusive human activity,
and planning authorities should take great care to
safeguard them from the adverse effects of noise. The
effect of noise on the enjoyment and conservation of areas
designated for their landscape and wildlife value should
therefore be taken into account.
FURTHER COPIES AND ENQUIRIES
17. Enquiries about this Circular should be addressed to
John Gunstone, Scottish Office Development Department,
Planning Division, 2-H, Victoria Quay, Edinburgh, EH6 6QQ
(telephone 0131 244 7710). Further copies and a list of
planning Circulars may be obtained from David Love (0131
244 7066) at the same address.
Yours faithfully
M T AFFOLTER